Virginia DUI: Parking While Intoxicated . . . The Last Word?

Do you remember the recent case of Sarafin v. Commonwealth?  Do you remember that this case was the latest example of our dear courts finding someone guilty of driving while intoxicated while merely sitting in his car with the radio turned on and the key in the auxiliary position?  Do you remember how I gave the defendant no chance at success given the latest appellate court decisions on the subject?  Well, Mr. Sarafin appealed . . . and he almost won.  But, ultimately, he lost and little has changed since we last went over this topic. Continue reading

Virginia DUI Law: But I Wasn’t Trying to Drive!

We will keep this one short.  Really short.  Must the prosecutor prove that you intended to operate your motor vehicle to convict you of DUI in Virginia?  Nope.

Virginia’s DUI statute was enacted to protect against “what could happen with an intoxicated individual behind the wheel, regardless of whether he intended to be there, turn on the car, or move the vehicle.”  Case v. Virginia, Record No. 2188-12-4 (Va. Ct. App. 2014).  Virginia’s DUI statute accordingly does not incorporate the typical mens rea requirement that the prosecutor must prove the defendant’s intent to commit the criminal act.  Id.  As such, it’s no defense to claim that you weren’t trying to drive.

Virginia Traffic Law: What’s a Fog Line? . . . or Don’t Drive on a Fog Line

In U.S. v. Williams, Criminal No. 3:13MJ137 (2013), a criminal defendant was charged with possession of marijuana, among a bunch of other crimes.  He moved the court to suppress all evidence of his crimes on the ground that the arresting officer lacked reasonable suspicion to stop the defendant’s vehicle in the first instance.  The arresting officer claimed that he did have reasonable suspicion to believe that the defendant had committed a crime: his car touched one of the fog lines on at least five occasions.  As such, the court was faced with some interest questions: (i) um, what is a fog line?, (ii) does simply touching a fog line constitute a crime?, and (iii) does simply touching a fog line at least give an officer reasonable suspicion that a crime was committed?  Richmond U.S. District Magistrate Judge David J. Novak fortunately had answers to these questions. Continue reading